Benchmarking the new computer

What good is upgrading without real numbers to compare the systems? Well, actually, it’s just as good. After all, it is still the same upgrade with or without benchmarks. But I did some anyway. I even overclocked the CPU and GPU and did some benchmarking with those updates as well. This resulted in a surprisingly small increase in performance.

OLD PC NEW PC Δ%: New PC OC Δ% over non-OC:
i7-2600 i7-4790K
8GB RAM 16GB RAM
GTX 550ti GTX 960
PC Mark 8 Home 3392 4450 31%
PC Mark 8 Work 2998 3817 27%
PC Mark 8 Creative 2633 4585 74%
3D Mark Ice Storm 71504 170795 139% 176984 4%
3D Mark Cloud Gate 11786 24219 105% 24943 3%
3D Mark Sky Diver 6359 21602 240% 21872 1%
3D Mark Firestrike 1834 6899 276% 6991 1%
3D Mark Firstrike Extreme 514 3511 583% 3544 1%

So, as you can see, the old computer was not terrible, but the new computer smokes it. Something interesting came out of the PC Mark tests. PC Mark tests things like audio compression, video scaling, spreadsheets, gaming, web browsing, etc… The new computer did slightly worse times on the web browsing (I blame no windows 8 drivers for my wireless network adapter) and, here is the big surprise, it was a ton slower on the gaming tests. Even though, as you can see by the graphics benchmarks, that gaming performance should be its staple measure. The gaming tests on PC Mark use Direct X 9. The tests for 3D Mark use Direct X 11 (IIRC). So is the new card really that bad at outdated tech or is something else messing with its chi?

BTW, every other test in the PC Mark tests was crazy fast. To the point that total test time dropped from 64 minutes to 44 minutes on the longest one. By crazy, I am talking things like the “video to go part 2” test dropped from 68 seconds to just 14. That’s an 80% drop.

So I think the overall numbers, even though they increased by a good margin, I think are severely being skewed by the poor gaming test performance.

After doing all the benchmarks, I decided to play with overclocking. The Gigabyte motherboard comes with some software that will automatically overclock you CPU and run it through some stability tests until it breaks it then it turns you back a few notches for your final setting. It tested my 4.0GHz system all the way up to 5.1 GHz before it failed. And the software settled on 4.6GHz for my final setting.

The Asus STRIX GTX 960 OC2 is made for overclocking and came pre-overclocked a little. I kicked it all the way up to 1420MHz and it ran fine. So I retested GPU benchmarks. And as you can see, the improvements were essentially statistical anomalies. In other words, the numbers vary that much each time you test anyway.

At this point, I did some load testing on the CPU and found that at 4.6GHz, it was getting up to 91°C which is a little higher than I wanted to see. With the CPU running at 4.0GHz, it never got over 75°C. So I turned it down to 4.4GHz and load tested again. At 4.4GHz, it never got over 75°C, just like the stock setting. So I left it at 4.4GHz. Looks like I found the limitation of that CPU cooler. And due to the insignificant performance gains the GPU overclocking showed, I turned it back down to the factory overclock setting.

Now, the website I used to help decide on CPU and video card choice is maintained by Passmark. They have their own benchmarking software for the full PC. And after running those tests, Iam thinking they may be more reliable than the PCMark tests.

Here are my Passmark scores:

OLD PC NEW PC Δ%:
Overall 2372.6 5251.2 121%
CPU Mark 8681 11735 35%
G3D Mark (video card) 2072 6681 222%
Memory Mark 2200 2716 23%
Disk Mark 633 4675 639%

According to the Passmark site, my CPU should score 11245. I am overclocked a bit, so I beat it. And their site says a standard GTX 960 video card is rated at 5987 where mine got 6681. I attribute that to the Asus card being overclocked. As for the hard drive score, have I said lately how much I love SSD’s? And mine score better than a bunch of Crucial and Kingston that seem to be gamer favorites.

Also one of the baseline reference systems Passmark compares my results to is a i7-5820K with a gigabyte X99 MB, 8GB RAM, same size Crucial SSD, and the vastly superior GTX 980 video card. And that system is rated at 4995 compared to my 5251. So yeah, I feel pretty good about this new build.

Advertisements

2 responses to “Benchmarking the new computer

    • I never experienced any thermal issues with it. However, the fan can get loud when it gets revved up. But after all the benchmarking I never saw much improvement over standard speeds, so I figured it didn’t justify the possible decrease in life span for the CPU, so I throttled it back to standard settings and the fan almost never even comes on. Either that, or it never speeds up loud enough to be heard over that stupid case fan. That thing is terrible. BTW, the case kind of sucks. I would go with something else that is a lot newer design if I were to do it again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s